Saturday, April 27, 2013

What the Living Do


What the Living Do

Marie Howe


Johnny, the kitchen sink has been clogged for days, some utensil probably fell down there.
And the Drano won't work but smells dangerous, and the crusty dishes have piled up

waiting for the plumber I still haven't called. This is the everyday we spoke of.
It's winter again: the sky's a deep, headstrong blue, and the sunlight pours through

the open living-room windows because the heat's on too high in here and I can't turn it off.
For weeks now, driving, or dropping a bag of groceries in the street, the bag breaking,

I've been thinking: This is what the living do. And yesterday, hurrying along those
wobbly bricks in the Cambridge sidewalk, spilling my coffee down my wrist and sleeve,

I thought it again, and again later, when buying a hairbrush: This is it.
Parking. Slamming the car door shut in the cold. What you called that yearning.

What you finally gave up. We want the spring to come and the winter to pass. We want
whoever to call or not call, a letter, a kiss--we want more and more and then more of it.

But there are moments, walking, when I catch a glimpse of myself in the window glass,
say, the window of the corner video store, and I'm gripped by a cherishing so deep

for my own blowing hair, chapped face, and unbuttoned coat that I'm speechless:
I am living. I remember you. 



This is a poem that made me want to be a poet. It might even be the poem that made me want to be a poet. And reading it now I feel so moved by it my throat thickens with tears that don't quite come. I feel that longing all over again, or as Howe quotes Johnny - that yearning. 

How to understand how it is working? it feels packed with detail: long, claustrophobic lines describe the trivia of everyday life - groceries, coffee, hairbrush, parking. So that we understand how busy it is to just live, how packed with stuff we have to do and get and make and be. But there is also breakdown going on: the kitchen sink is blocked, the dishes can't be done, the heating won't turn off, coffee is spilt, the grocery bag breaking. Things are clogged, dangerous, wobbly. The poem's narrator is busy, her life a bit unmanageable, even. But even so, even though we perpetually want things to be different, even though things are so fucked-up, even though life is difficult, we can receive the blessing of it, we can love this life, this life that "I am living".  And perhaps this remembering is an act of honouring those who lost their lives. People like Johnny who we might infer died too young and even perhaps took his own life? (What you finally gave up)

So, in terms of how the poem is constructed, there are these long lines that seem packed with information. And the use of enjambment also gives this sense of hurry, of too much to do and too much to think about, too much to fit in the already long lines. But the effect is not overstated, which would make it be a bit of a joke, rather the sense of too much to do, to much to cope with is just quietly stated and contained, kind of the way I often feel, that maybe a lot of us feel. Pressured and overloaded, but coping. 

I'm not sure about other musical elements of the poem - I can identify some sound patterns that make the first half of the poem more percussive (if that is the right word), more "cutlery" than the second half of the poem, which does sound softer and more pensive, more reflective. So, the first couplet has those hard sounds of 'K' - kitchen, clogged, crusty and 'D' - days, drano, dangerous, dishes. But then the second couplet goes a bit softer and dreamer - waiting, we, winter; and the internal rhyming of 'blue' with 'through'.  But then we're back on the job again in the third couplet - driving, dropping, bag breaking. And in the fourth couplet - "Parking. Slamming the car door shut in the cold." I just get the sense of that, it's not special fancy poetic language, it's just cold and hard and life is busy and you have to carry your own groceries and get stuff done.  And it's material for a poem. 

It seems to me that the busy-ness and the reflection weave in and out of those first five couplets. But then once the idea of "that yearning" is introduced, the mood turns entirely reflective. And under the heading of what the living do, we can see ourselves as this weird tribe, the living, who are full of wants. And the writing becomes softened by all these softer sounds of W and U and O and OA - we/want/what; you/who; more and more and then more; walking/window/own blowing.

And then the ending, which is so beautiful: "I am living. I remember you." We have been arrested by the previous lines, when the narrator is "gripped by a cherishing so deep" and the hard sounds of G, P, B and D. And then in the pause we observe the intensely ordinary details of hair and face and unbuttoned coat seen in reflection, and we are thus invited to see ourselves, to imagine seeing ourselves in this very ordinary way and to know that we live. The poet lets us pause and recall our life and those we have lost.

Thursday, April 25, 2013

And I was alive

And I was alive

And I was alive in the the blizzard of the blossoming pear,
Myself I stood in the storm of the bird-cherry tree.
It was all leaflife and starshower, self-shattering power,
And it was all aimed at me.

What is this dire delight flowering fleeing always earth?
What is being? What is truth?

Blossoms rupture and rapture the air,
All hover and hammer,
Time intensified and time intolerable, sweetness raveling rot,
It is now. It is not.

Osip Mandelstam (1937)
Trans. Christian Wiman


I know from hearing Christian Wiman speak about this that it is the last poem Mandelstam wrote, that he was destined to be murdered by the Stalinist regime against which he protested, and he knew that at the time he wrote this. So it has that poignancy of looking back on a life loved and lived well, that is ending too soon.

The first stanza suggests that fullness of life, the beauty and richness of life on this planet, but at the same time there's something menacing in there. So while there is the blossoming pear, the bird-cherry tree, leaflife and starshower (lovely made up words) - there is also a blizzard, a storm, and self-shattering power - and "all aimed at me". And I think that perhaps it is this ambivalence of beauty and violence in life that is summoned here, this dire delight, that we are always dying, always losing what we love, always subject to a certain kind of violence by mere fact that we are human and therefore subject to aging, sickness, death - not to mention the explicit and murderous violence and cruelty of others.

And Mandelstam makes it personal - I was alive, Myself I stood, it was all aimed at me. Why is that important? This is what makes it human - I, this man, this me, this particular life which is mine. But then this self is not mentioned again in the rest of the poem, then it is what is being, what is truth. We move from my life, the tragedy of the loss of my life to a contemplation of the nature of existence, which is fleeting and destined to end.

The third and final stanza rests in the present, you can imagine him looking out of his window on a summer's day, sensing the sweetness and the decay even in that moment of beauty and falling into the present and knowing that the present is always already lost - It is now. It is not.

The first stanza has satisfying alliterations, rhythms, rhymes - and repeated sounds that emphasise a series of downbeats that underscore the speaker's aliveness, his I-ness. And then the alliterations - blizzard/blossoming; stood/storm; and rhymes - tree/me; starshower/power. These repeated sounds seem to create the contained world which compels the reader's attention to what the speaker is saying.

In the second stanza, the three questions don't ask why? but rather what? three times what? So no sense of being a victim here, but rather a kind of distancing curiosity that is belied by the language effects of dire delight flowering fleeing and the rhymes - fleeing/being; earth/truth. And somehow these sounds bring forward the sense of loss for all of us, that being is always fleeing, that the frailty of our materiality is our truth. So it is somehow impersonal, yet we are all implicated.

And in the last stanza this alliteration again: rupture and rapture; hover and hammer. A repetition of the blossoms from the first line creates a sense of continuity, but now these blossoms are too much, their fragrance hovers but also hammers and they are decaying - sweetness raveling rot. Because he knows that the end is near, time is intensified and the time that is available is too packed with sensation to bear, it is intolerable. And then the staccato of the last two lines hammers home the ending of it all. It is now. It is not.